The adjectives correspond in terms of sex and number with the nouns they change into French. As with verbs, chords are sometimes displayed only in spelling, as forms written with different modes of concordance are sometimes pronounced in the same way (z.B pretty, pretty); Although, in many cases, the final consonan is pronounced in female forms, but mute in male forms (z.B. small vs. small). Most plural forms end in -s, but this consonant is pronounced only in contexts of connection, and these are determinants that help to understand whether it is the singular or the plural. In some cases, the entries of the verbs correspond to the subject or object. An anonymous expert wonders how this proposal can take into account the fact that a single agreement is needed for the predicates that apply to the NPC as a whole and not to individual members (examples below, huddleston – Pullum Reference Huddleston and Pullum2002: 502). There is also a consensus between pronouns and precursors. Examples can be found in English (although English pronouns mainly follow natural sex and not grammatical sex): also note the agreement that manifests itself in the fact that it is even in the subjunctive mind. Changers, Stephen and Larisa ZlatiĆ©.

2003. The many faces of the agreement. Stanford: CSLI. In addition to identifying the facts, why semantic concordance is not possible when the NPC is reconstructed, we also receive an explanation of the changes in preaching/subjectity given by the dikkens (reference of the Dikken2001). The same principle plays a role here. In Section 2.3, I justified the proposition that the NPC is at the reading of spec, TP to LF, while it is below T in predictive courses, since it must be reconstructed as a predicate to its starting position at LF (see Heycock 1995 reference Heycock 1995 and data in (20)). In both measures, the NPC is pronounced in spec, TP, since the NPC UF remains there; In preaching, however, iFs restore. Semantic concordance is therefore possible in thematic reading, but not in predictive reading. Both structures are listed below. Footnote [22] I guess the agreement will be implemented as a feature sharing.

For models of argumentation and form in a minimalist setting, see Frampton and Gutmann (2006), Pesetsky and Torrego (2007), Rooryck and Vanden Wyngaerd (2011) and Danon (2011). The speech planning processes, which allow Dendamit to obtain a correspondence between subjects and verbs (the Catsplois fell asleep), have been extensively studied as windows in the mechanisms of dielanguage production.